Cory Haberman, director of the Institute of Crime Science at the University of Cincinnati, was among a panel of experts who discussed public safety and the significance and interpretation of crime statistics on a WVXU radio show.
Haberman, an associate professor in the UC School of Criminal Justice, explains that the public’s perception of crime is often shaped by what he calls “signal crimes” — particularly shocking incidents, happen in public or involve well-known people.
These incidents, he says, tend to dominate the news and shape public opinion, even if overall crime isn’t increasing.
Haberman stressed that while such incidents are serious and shouldn’t be dismissed, they aren’t necessarily evidence of a larger crime wave.
Instead, he encourages people to look at long-term data trends to get a more accurate picture of what’s happening in their city.
The panel pointed out that crime data can be complex, with differences depending on how you define crime, which neighbourhoods you examine and which periods you compare.
They suggest that taking a broader, more analytical view can help separate perception from reality.
In short, while concern about crime is understandable, the experts emphasised that it’s important to examine what the data shows before drawing conclusions.
